PATC HOME
Online Training Registration
Law Enforcement Training Courses and Schedule
Law Enforcement Services & Resources
PATC Links
Law Enforcement Training Institute
PATC Internal Affairs Institute
PATC Internal Association of Hostage Negotiators
PATC Class Materials
Contact Us      Aboout PATC      PATC Publishing/Bookstore      Training Partners      Newsletter, Training Brochures, RSS, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIN

PATC E-NewsletterDefensive Demeanor Profile
By Stan Walters

Download a Printable Version of this article Here            Adobe PDF required

All our individual behaviors are learned through the trial and error process from our life experiences. If a behavior is successful during a stress period, it’s likely it will be used again. If it fails, we adapt our behaviors to overcome the failed attempt to relieve stress. This unique cluster of stress response is what we call the “Defensive Demeanor Profile” or DDP.

The term “Defensive Demeanor Profile” was coined by Dr. Martha Davis and this author during our in depth research project on micro behaviors conducted at John Jay College. We noticed that subjects we observed had some form of general stress behavior during their interrogation. Buried in the middle of the of all the DDP information we would find the subject’s deception signals.

Most observers of deception fail to spot deception because they tend to be distracted by a subject’s DDP and define those behaviors as signs of deception when in fact they are nothing more than general stress behaviors. We made the observation in our study that these DDP behaviors where most likely the product of years of stress response reactions and where more the “noise” or “static” of human behavior and were significantly responsible for distracting the observer from any reliable credibility cues.

The fact that all interviewed subjects including victims, witnesses, prospective employees, informants as well as suspects all generate their own DDP make the establishment of each person’s “constant” of behavior that much more critical when assessing the person’s credibility. Without a firm grasp of each subject’s DDP as demonstrated under stress you are not going to able to recognize and correctly identify his or her signs of deception.

Accurate analysis of deception cannot be made without establishing s subject’s “constant” or baseline. Take a few moments to make note mentally of your subject’s “constant” then look for changes from that pattern which will most likely be your subject’s DDP. Buried in the middle of the DDP signals your subject generates you will find subject’s lie signs – if there are any. Remember that deception signals are a form of stress but not all stress signs indicate that the person is lying.

____________________________________

About the Author:

Stan Walters

© 2006 by Stan B. Walters "The Lie Guy®"
Stan B. Walters writes, teaches & does keynote speeches internationally on deception, interview & interrogation.  He is regularly called on by the media as an expert to comment on high profile cases.

Web:  www.TheLieGuy.com
blog: www.TheLieGuyBlog.com

 

SEARCH ALL PATC SITES
 
 
 
 

FEATURED
Gatlinburg 2017

NEW!
Gatlinburg 2017

This training is registered with MCOLES!


RECENT PATC LEGAL ARTICLES
 

July 5  Legal Update
Fourth Amendment

June 28  Legal Update
Fourth Amendment

June 21  Legal Update
Fourth Amendment

June 14  Legal Update
Sixth Amendment

View Legal Article Archive

 

ARTICLE ARCHIVES


 

Public Agency Training Council - 5235 Decatur Blvd - Indianapolis, IN 46241 - 800.365.0119

About PATC | PATC Publishing/Bookstore | Training Partners | E-Newsletter | Contact Us | Home | Site Terms of Use Policy