Drug/Narcotic Investigations: Legal Issues & Best Practices
DATES: 8/21/2017 through 8/22/2017
INSTRUCTOR(S): Shaun Santos
LOCATION: Public Agency Training Council Training Center - 5235 Decatur Blvd, Indianapolis, IN 46241
HOTEL: Holiday Inn - Indianapolis, IN 317-856-6200
$89 Double or Single
Identify with PATC to receive discounted room rate. Book Room Online Here
COURSE REGISTRATION FEE: $295.00 Includes all training materials, and a Certificate of Completion.
Sgt. Santos has been a law enforcement officer for 20 years, with over 15 years experience as a Narcotics Detective. He has extensive experience working with the Drug Enforcement Administration conducting electronic surveillance investigations in to the Drug Trafficking Organizations. Shaun is currently assigned to the DEA’s Financial Investigations Team (FIT), anti-money laundering group, responsible for conducting large international money laundering investigations. He has experience with foreign and domestic money pick-ups, international bank wire transfers, familiarity with Black Market Peso Exchange, and Attorney General Exempt Operations (AGEO), allowing for the laundering of drug proceeds in furtherance of narcotics investigations.
Shaun has received his Bachelor Degree in Criminal Justice, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA; Masters Degree from Anna Maria College; and Juris Doctorate from Suffolk University Law School.
Pre-Payment is NOT required to register or attend this seminar
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR THIS SEMINAR
|Legal Issues in Law Enforcement Tactical Operations:
One of the most critical tasks in law enforcement involves narcotics investigations
and operations. While the success of these operations requires extensive
training and proper equipment; success also requires sound decision making
from the moment the decision is made to undertake a narcotics operation.
Over the last decade, narcotics operations have come under the scrutiny of
the media and the courts. This scrutiny is largely the results of lawsuits
filed against agencies and officers following a narcotics operation that
has not been successful or that has led to injuries to suspects and/or informants.
These cases have focused on law enforcement agencies and their overall narcotics
enforcement operation. The purpose of this program is to highlight
the state of the law with respect to narcotics units and operations.
Much of the developing law can be found in reported decisions of the federal
courts. The course utilizes the case-study approach in order to identify
the important policy and practice considerations that will assist narcotics
unit commanders; supervisors and officers make legally defensible decisions
without compromising operations during narcotics investigations. The
materials will also provide officers with legally defensible practices that
will enhance their ability to bring admissible evidence before the courts.
The program takes a three-tier approach. First, participants will be
presented with the legal cases that impact law enforcement liability from
the standpoint of the agency and individual officers and supervisors.
Second, participants will be presented with cases specifically related to
the operation of narcotics investigations. Finally, the training turns
toward the policy and training issues that will enhance the ability of officers,
supervisors and agencies in avoiding liability while at the same time reducing
the possibility of the suppression of evidence in criminal prosecutions.
The course is unique in the fact that it takes a practical approach to legal
principles impacting narcotics operations and provides a road map to an operational
implementation of the legal principles without hindering operations or compromising
Participants will gain knowledge in the following areas:
Liability in Law Enforcement Operations: This session focuses
on civil liability for individual officers in the various law enforcement
tasks. Using the task oriented approach; the session will be limited
to those areas that are also applicable to the narcotics officer.
Agency Liability: This session reviews the law with respect
to agency liability. Students will be presented with the law relating
to civil rights claims brought against an agency as the result of an officer’s
Training: This session examines the law relating to an agency’s
failure to train officers for recurring (foreseeable) police tasks.
Liability in Narcotics Operations: This session utilizes the principles
from the previous sessions in reviewing cases with direct application to
Critical Tasks in Narcotics Operations: This session will focus
on the critical tasks of a narcotics operation and identify the specific
tasks that will expose the investigators and the agency to liability.
Search Warrants: This session focuses on the state of the law related
to search warrants as well as the exceptions to the warrant requirement.
It should be recognized that when officers breach the rules of criminal procedure,
they risk the possibility of a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Participants will identify the constitutional mandates related to search
warrants and the warrant exceptions.
The Concept of Particularity and Specificity: The session will begin
with a review of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Groh
v. Ramirez and its impact on the drafting of defensible search warrants.
Pre-Raid Planning: The failure to develop a sound pre-raid plan
quickly becomes an issue when officers conducting the raid are faced with
resistance and forced to react. In cases where reaction is required
plaintiff’s expert will attempt to testify as to how the failure of a pre-raid
plan created the need for a police reaction. This session will focus
on issues related to pre-raid planning and the “best police practices” related
to these plans.
Knock and Announce: Where are we? The trilogy of cases
from the United States Supreme Court on the concept of “knock and announce”
provides the framework for when officers may dispense the requirement of
knocking as well as how quickly they can move forward after knocking and
announcing. This session will analyze the current rules and provide
participants with a formula for making defensible decisions with respect
to knocking and announcing.
Special Legal Issues in Narcotics Investigations: The use of
informants can lead to dramatic liability. This session will begin
by looking at cases involving the protection of informants. Examples
such as Butera v. District of Columbia where the initial jury award (since
vacated) against the District was 98 million dollars will be used to discuss
investigator and agency obligations to informants. The session will
also discuss additional legal issues such as liability related to the seizure
of property as well as funds held by narcotics units.
Audits and Inspections: Agencies cannot afford to wait until enduring
the worst case scenario to determine if their operations are consistent with
the best police practices. This session will focus on the concept of
audits and inspections as a means to detect deficiencies before the crisis.
Participants will review audits and inspections material specifically related
to the narcotics function that may be implemented to identify areas of improvement
that will help reduce liability.
Policy Development for Narcotics Units: Policy Development:
Developing the most defensible policy and training for narcotics units.
This session will focus on sound policy development that will make officers
and agencies a more difficult target for plaintiff’s attorney.